← BlogFor both sides

Angel check sizes, ownership math, and what a round really needs

How angel check sizes translate into ownership and dilution, how many angels a round needs, and the math founders and investors should run before committing.

A close view of a yellow and grey wall in flat daylight
Photo by Nicolas Picard on Unsplash

Angel check sizes vary more than any other number in early stage finance. The useful question is never what is typical. It is what a given check buys, and how many of them a round needs to be worth running.

The one piece of math both sides should run

Ownership is the check divided by the post money valuation. A check of fifty thousand into a company at a five million post money cap buys one percent, before any later dilution. That is the entire calculation, and it is worth doing out loud in the first conversation because it settles two arguments at once: whether the check is meaningful to the investor, and whether the round is meaningful to the company.

Founders should also run the round level version. If you are selling fifteen percent, and your average check is fifty thousand, you need roughly fifteen angels to fill a seven hundred and fifty thousand dollar round. Fifteen angels means somewhere north of a hundred conversations.

What check size signals

  • A small first check is often a relationship opening, not a verdict. Many angels start small deliberately and follow on later with far more.
  • A large first check from someone new to your sector deserves a conversation about what they expect in return.
  • An angel who writes the same size check into everything is running a portfolio strategy, which is a good sign of a working process.

For angels: sizing against a portfolio, not a company

Early stage returns are concentrated in a small number of positions. A portfolio of three companies is a bet, not a strategy. If you intend to invest seriously, decide the total you are willing to deploy over several years, divide it into enough positions to survive the base rate of failure, and hold some back for follow ons in the companies that work.

The most common angel mistake is not backing the wrong company. It is putting the whole allocation into the first four deals seen and having nothing left when the best one raises again.

Dilution, honestly

Angels who invest early and never follow on get diluted at every subsequent round. That is the deal, and it is fine, because the entry price reflects it. What is not fine is being surprised by it. Before committing, ask what the company expects to raise next and model your position after one more round at a plausible price.

Founders should be ready for that question. Being able to answer it calmly is a stronger signal than any projection in the deck.

The number that matters more than the check

Whether the round closes. A company that raises seventy percent of its target and stops has a runway problem it will be managing for the next year. Size the round at what the business needs to reach a real milestone, then fill it. An oversubscribed small round is a much better position than a half filled large one.

Keep reading

From the blog
Flowing blue and teal shapes folding over each otherFor both sides

Primary rounds and secondaries: what the difference means for your cap table

Primary rounds put money into the company; secondaries move existing shares between people. Here is how each one affects founders, angels, and the cap table.

Fine blue lines curving across a pale fieldFor both sides

Syndicates, networks, and solo angels: which raise fits you

How angel syndicates, curated angel networks, and solo angels differ in speed, fees, cap table impact, and what each one asks of a founder.